Skip to Main Content Header

Assessment Types

Literature Review

Key Points

  • The main purpose it to examine and evaluate research on a specific topic.
  • It can be a stand alone assessment or part of an assessment like a report or research paper
  • Does not just summarise research but critically evaluates and analyses
  • Requires wide reading on a specific topic

What is a Literature Review?

A literature review is different to an essay. It provides a snapshot of what we know about the research on a particular topic. The author is required to do a comprehensive search of relevant and recent literature (journal articles, text books, websites) to identify what is known about a topic. The main themes are then identified and crtically analysed. A literature review should cover:

  • Compare and contrast the research, what are the common themes in the research?
  • Are there any debates or disagreements in findings?
  • Are there any gaps or limitations in the research reviewed?
  • What are the strengths and limitations of the research?

What are the steps to write a literature review?

Adapted from Scribbr. Click here to learn more

Tips for Success Writing a Literature Review

  1. If it is your first time allow more time that you would for an essay or report.
  2. Finding quality research will make every step easier. Contact the library for help finding research.
  3. It can be difficult keeping track of sources. Use a note taking guide.
  4. Be flexible. Your structure may change as you write.

How do I Structure a Literature Review?

 

Introduction 	10% of word count 	define the topic, provide an appropriate context for reviewing the literature, and explain the organisation of your literature review Body Paragraphs 	organised on the basis of ideas, rather than authors. In other words, the literature should be grouped according to common theme 	Can use headings and subheadings Conclusion  	10% of word count 	summarise the major findings of the literature review 	make an evaluative statement about the current literature on the topic, point out major gaps or flaws, and outline areas for future study.

 

Organising Body Paragraphs

Do not arrange by articles. 

Paragraphs can not be organised as a summary of each article

Arrange by themes and ideas across the articles. 

Similarities  Differences Problems Solutions Gaps Methodologies

What does it look like?

Adapted from:

Ni Shé, C., Farrell, O., Brunton, J., & Costello, E. (2021). Integrating design thinking into instructional design: The #OpenTeach case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology38(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6667

              Instructional design (ID) is defined as the translating principles of learning and instruction into plans for instructional materials, activities, information resources, and evaluation (Smith & Ragan, 2005, p. 2). ID as an approach to designing and developing learning experiences dates back to the Second World War and has long been recognised as critical to the enactment of quality teaching and learning in HE (Conole, 2013; Dimitriadis & Goodyear, 2013; Laurillard, 2012). ID has since evolved with many different models now in existence, the most referenced being the analyse, design, develop, implement, evaluate (ADDIE) model (Adnan & Ritzhaupt, 2018; Branch & Kopcha, 2014; Göksu et al., 2017; Svihla, 2017).

First sentence of the paragraph introduces the theme: defining ID.  

APA 7: Use quotation marks and page number for a direct quote

The author supports their argument with several authors. They have used the ; to synthesise multiple sources

      However, instructional designers have been moving away from traditional models such as ADDIE because “design is no longer just concerned with content, or a single technological learning artefact, but with learning environments” (Wasson & Kirschner, 2020, p. 827). A further criticism of traditional ID models is that they are too slow and inflexible due to waterfall or linear design stages which must be completed step by step and focus too much on content and not enough on student-educator interaction (Bates, 2019; Shivla, 2017). Therefore, the focus of design has moved from content creation to learning experience, an emphasis on speed, flexibility and non-linear processes. This shift in thinking and approach draws on ideas from disciplines such as product development and software design (Adnan & Ritzhaupt, 2018; Wasson & Kirschner, 2020). As agile (iterative, flexible and adaptable) and user-centred methods were developed for software development, so too were they imported into ID, bringing a focus on the user or student experience of interacting with the interface or learning environment (Adnan & Ritzhaupt, 2018; Tawfik et al., 2021). For example, design thinking, an agile user-centred approach, has begun to be applied in the field of ID.

First sentence links the next main idea of the new paragraph to the previous paragraph.

The author uses linking words to guide the reader and show the relationship between the research.

 

What language do I use in a Literature Review?

Referring to sources

Much of the current literature on X pays particular attention to …
The existing literature on X is extensive and focuses particularly on …
There is a relatively small body of literature that is concerned with …

Author: reported / identified / showed that /demonstrated that …

Comparing and contrasting

Other writers have argued that …
Other studies have concluded that …
Unlike Smith, Jones (2013) argues that
In contrast to Smith, Jones (2013) argues that
Smith (2010) presents an X account, whilst Jones (2011)
While Smith (2008) focuses on X, Jones (2009) is more concerned with
A broader perspective has been adopted by Smith (213) who argues that
Contrary to previous studies, Jones et al. demonstrated the efficacy of…
This result conflicts with Smith’s (1965) previously mentioned study which found that …
Conversely, Smith (2010) reported no significant difference in mortality between X and Y

Discussing findings

One interesting finding is …
Another important finding is that …
The most important result was that …

This finding is consistent with that of Smith (2000) who …
Comparison of the findings with those of other studies confirms …
This also accords with our earlier observations, which showed that …

Future research:

Despite these promising results, questions remain.
Additional research is needed to better understand the …
A further study with more focus on X is therefore suggested.

Being Critical

Such approaches, however, have failed to address …

The research to date has tended to focus on X rather than

However, the main weakness of the study is the failure to address how …

However, such explanations tend to overlook the fact that …

Jones (2003) has challenged some of Smith’s conclusions, arguing that …
Another major criticism of Smith’s study, made by Jones (2003), is that …

Further Resources

footer