Skip to Main Content Header

Assessment Types

Literature Review

Key Points

  • The main purpose it to examine and evaluate research on a specific topic.
  • It can be a stand alone assessment or part of an assessment like a report or research paper
  • Does not just summarise research but critically evaluates and analyses
  • Requires wide reading on a specific topic

What is a Literature Review?

A literature review is different to an essay. It provides a snapshot of what we know about the research on a particular topic. The author is required to do a comprehensive search of relevant and recent literature (journal articles, text books, websites) to identify what is known about a topic. The main themes are then identified and crtically analysed. A literature review should cover:

  • Compare and contrast the research, what are the common themes in the research?
  • Are there any debates or disagreements in findings?
  • Are there any gaps or limitations in the research reviewed?
  • What are the strengths and limitations of the research?

What are the steps to write a literature review?

Adapted from Scribbr. Click here to learn more

Tips for Success Writing a Literature Review

  1. If it is your first time allow more time that you would for an essay or report.
  2. Finding quality research will make every step easier. Contact the library for help finding research.
  3. It can be difficult keeping track of sources. Use a note taking guide.
  4. Be flexible. Your structure may change as you write.

How do I Structure a Literature Review?

 

Introduction 	10% of word count 	define the topic, provide an appropriate context for reviewing the literature, and explain the organisation of your literature review Body Paragraphs 	organised on the basis of ideas, rather than authors. In other words, the literature should be grouped according to common theme 	Can use headings and subheadings Conclusion  	10% of word count 	summarise the major findings of the literature review 	make an evaluative statement about the current literature on the topic, point out major gaps or flaws, and outline areas for future study.

 

Organising Body Paragraphs

Do not arrange by articles. 

Paragraphs can not be organised as a summary of each article

Arrange by themes and ideas across the articles. 

Similarities  Differences Problems Solutions Gaps Methodologies

What does a Literature Review Look Like? 2

Adapted From:

Rathnayake, D., Clarke, M., & Jayasinghe, V. I. (2021). Health system performance and health system preparedness for the post-pandemic impact of COVID-19: A review.  International Journal of Healthcare Management, 14(1), 250–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2020.1836732

           Waiting times for elective surgeries have become a major policy concern in many countries with health systems operated with public funds (Siciliani & Hurst, 2005).  The burdens on hospital systems during the COVID-19 pandemic have caused waiting times for elective surgeries to increase dramatically over the past few years. Some authors have recommended systems to prioritize patients who are on the waiting list and to re-order the queue on long waiting lists for elective surgery to reduce the adverse effects of waiting (Ng & Lundstrom, 2014; Curtis et al., 2010).  Alternative suggestions include temporary expansion of facilities or reverse triage strategies (Rathnayake et al., 2019). However, despite many discussions about the need to shorten these long waiting lists for elective surgeries, the problem has not been resolved and further research is needed to establish best practices for overburdened health systems post pandemic.

 

One main idea introduced in the paragraph: waiting time for elective surgery.

 

Synthesis findings from many sources and references.

 

 

 

Contrasts the findings of one paper with another pointing out alternatives.

 

Identifies the need for future research.

         There are also important concerns about the safety and treatment for people in vulnerable groups. The potential risks of the COVID-19 outbreak for pregnant women has also become a major concern, not limited to the unknown risk of vertical transmission of the virus (Qiao, 2020). The use of lockdowns as a public health strategy has been used earlier in epidemics in some West African countries (Gostin & Friendman, 2015). Quarantining of people, with lock down of geographic areas has exposed vulnerable populations to extraordinary stressful situations, making them prone to various mental and psychological problems (Xiao, 2019). This might further increase the existing burden on healthcare systems (Chen et al., 2020).

First sentence introduces the main theme of the article (impacts COVID on vulnerable people )

 

 

The focus is on research with several studies cited.

 

The writer has used multiple references to show agreement in the literature

What language do I use in a Literature Review?

Referring to sources

Much of the current literature on X pays particular attention to …
The existing literature on X is extensive and focuses particularly on …
There is a relatively small body of literature that is concerned with …

Author: reported / identified / showed that /demonstrated that …

Comparing and contrasting

Other writers have argued that …
Other studies have concluded that …
Unlike Smith, Jones (2013) argues that
In contrast to Smith, Jones (2013) argues that
Smith (2010) presents an X account, whilst Jones (2011)
While Smith (2008) focuses on X, Jones (2009) is more concerned with
A broader perspective has been adopted by Smith (213) who argues that
Contrary to previous studies, Jones et al. demonstrated the efficacy of…
This result conflicts with Smith’s (1965) previously mentioned study which found that …
Conversely, Smith (2010) reported no significant difference in mortality between X and Y

Discussing findings

One interesting finding is …
Another important finding is that …
The most important result was that …

This finding is consistent with that of Smith (2000) who …
Comparison of the findings with those of other studies confirms …
This also accords with our earlier observations, which showed that …

Future research:

Despite these promising results, questions remain.
Additional research is needed to better understand the …
A further study with more focus on X is therefore suggested.

Being Critical

Such approaches, however, have failed to address …

The research to date has tended to focus on X rather than

However, the main weakness of the study is the failure to address how …

However, such explanations tend to overlook the fact that …

Jones (2003) has challenged some of Smith’s conclusions, arguing that …
Another major criticism of Smith’s study, made by Jones (2003), is that …

Further Resources

footer